Charlie Kirk and Clandestine War

The video of Charlie Kirk’s murder demonstrated several very serious problems for analysis of a lone shooter perspective. Like JFK’s Oswald Patsy, the Kirk projected shooter (Tyler Robinson) demonstrates ballistics that are impossible both in theory and in practice under 99.5% of scenarios.

If 30-06 is incapable of the ballistic wound profile, than another methodology is at work. End of Story.

The following pictures are a basic expectations of ballistic wound paths from a 30 caliber projectile at rifle speeds. Specifically this would be something in the 180GR range. At face value, it does not meet the threshold of reasonable when analyzing the Kirk shooting.

So what does the Kirk shooting tell us?

For this to be conspiratorial in nature, the same principles would have to apply as with the JFK case. That is to say, there is a primary shooter location, and a fall location. The fall location will be opposing the one that they wish to provide as the actual one. With that said, the introduction of the Bullet to the victim would have to be completed in some manner. Considering the scale of conspiracy, this would be minimalist in nature and likely utilize a SABOT (pronounced sa-bo) capability.

What is a Sabot in Firearms?

A sabot is a device used in firearms ammunition to help propel a smaller projectile down a larger barrel with greater accuracy and efficiency. It’s essentially a protective sleeve that encases a smaller, sub-caliber round, allowing it to be fired from a larger-caliber firearm.

Sabots are commonly used in shotgun slugs, where they house a solid, aerodynamic projectile for better range and accuracy than standard shotgun pellets. They’re also used in military applications for armor-piercing rounds, where they allow smaller, high-density projectiles (like tungsten) to be fired from larger caliber firearms.

In short, sabots are a crucial part of modern ammunition, improving performance and enabling a wider variety of projectiles to be fired from a range of different weapons.

Notably, a sabot will not damage the rifling if any already exists upon the bullet itself. –This makes it a valuable tool for this discussion.

A Youtube personality, Zeb Boykin, highlighted that the wound profile is is consistent with a rear based shot and that it is an exit wound that we see in the front neck. His position was further reinforced, early on, by Paramount Tactical, who then, appears to have recanted that position.

It is nonetheless, the most notable perspective that would explain the lack of visible Trauma so it must be scrutinized as being the most likely.

Most conspiracy theories that I have looked into indicate a side shot or one from below, the so called trap door. None of these theories are consistent with the trajectory that is highlighted. So, I put the scene into a 3D Modeling application and drew around the subject to ascertain sources. There is only one possible source and that is highlighted here by means of comparing the camera angles within the tent, extrapolating height, (Charlie appears to be sitting higher than usual) and then making the determination as to the wound path that is consistent with a frontal exit.

We must examine the means and capability for this to be achieved if it is the source.

First and foremost, and I think it goes without saying, but I will mention it for sake of highlighting chain of custody concerns, if this theory is correct, than it is likely that Kirk’s Camera and Equipment Technicians are compromised. They are compromised because they removed the camera immediately following the shooting, which, regardless of their explanations, is itself disturbing, and is itself evidence of destroying or tampering a crime scene. It is a violation of chain of custody and of all basic principles for maintaining its integrity.

For that reason, they should have been immediately suspected, stopped, and the construction of the camera body, or the whereabouts of its components, scrutinized.

Any evidence they introduce post removal to the contrary of maintaining chain of custody is tainted and not valuable to a complete and thorough investigation. The camera is not just proposed as something that recorded the assassination, it is itself likely the weapon that made it possible.

Let us dissect the medical reports to date and review the skeletal body that is within the neck compared with the findings above.

— Well, It sure would be convenient to have access to the medical examiners report, but to date, no such report has been made available to the public. So we must make educated assessments upon what is visible and the actions taken at the time.

The immediate paving over of the grass tells a story all by itself about scene manipulation and the control of lost evidence.

The only purpose to mandating the removal of sod and several inches of earth would be to ensure potential evidence or proofs of nefarious action could be removed to limit or eliminate fully any potential arguments against Kirk’s Organization, its people, or the Federal Government, in its quickly removing Kirk from Utah. So we have to ask the question, if this theory is a thing, what did they cover up, what did they remove, what did they hide?

When reviewing the films frames, Kirk is shot, and this abnormal object appears briefly, tumbling down, from above, across his forearm. What is it?

These images to the left and right represent a rough estimation of a 30 caliber projectile overlayed upon the area highlighted above, with color saturation levels moved to highlight the differences in the shape. This is then compared to photos of fired and recovered 30 caliber projectiles. The similarities in shape are noticeable.

Please take notice to how closely they align with limited effort. Take additional presence of mind to take into account deformation of a bullet when traversing skeletal structure at subsonic velocities and how that would subsequently impact the round as it changes to a tumbling path having come from a subsonic velocity, violently altered within the subject. When we consider the behavior of subsonic 30 caliber bullets and their behavior we see strong correlations that point to those kinds of velocities.

So the question now goes to, how did they manage to do this and what could the platform for it be?

This is the part where we have to put on our Criminal Justice Hats and really examine technology and its application to clandestine warfare. The Camera is housing a firing capability with a deliverable of a single shot sabot that would be carrying a previously fired 30 caliber projectile, one that would be later linked to the 30-06 rifle. This is central to the theory.

Therefore the camera is in part an execution weapon with a remote firing capability, either through a corded or wireless capacity, perhaps bluetooth. Since gun powder residue on the back of Kirk would be problematic to explanation they have to remove gunpowder entirely. This now puts the theory into a a pneumatically operated handgun sized weapon with a saboted 30 caliber projectile.

What could the base for the platform be and could a nation state use Research and Development to create and implement such a design, one that could potentially fit into the large aperture of a Camera.

Let’s use AI to simulate the Theory.

Scenario Overview: Provide base estimation of ballistics, trauma, and forensic analysis for a seated subject that is shot from behind at a downward angle given the data points.

• Weapon: Bintac M50 airgun with saboted 30-caliber round.
• Distance: Approximately 6 feet, shot from downward angle at seated subject.
• Projectile Characteristics: 30-caliber bullet, saboted in a larger casing, traveling at an estimated velocity of 900-1100 fps (due to the lighter weight and high velocity of the airgun round).
• Shot Placement: The projectile strikes the left side of the neck, aiming to hit T1 (first thoracic vertebra), likely severing key arteries (such as the jugular vein and carotid artery), and exiting through the left side of the throat.

---

Forensic Digital Autopsy: Simulated Use of Bintac M50

1. Wound Ballistics and Initial Trauma:

Projectile Velocity & Energy Transfer:

• Bintac M50 Airgun: The 30-caliber saboted round travels at an estimated velocity of 900-1100 fps, delivering a relatively high velocity.
  • Energy Output: Assuming a mass of 200-230 grains (13-15 grams) for the saboted round, the energy (in joules) would be comparable to high-velocity rounds from rifles or handguns.

Wound Characteristics:

• Bintac M50: Upon impact, the 30-caliber saboted round would likely cause puncture wounds to the skin, muscle, and possibly bone due to the velocity and penetrating nature of the projectile.
  • If the round hits T1, it would sever the jugular vein, carotid artery, and potentially the spinal cord, leading to rapid hemorrhage.
  • However, since the energy transfer from the airgun is lower than that of a traditional firearm, fired in the subsonic range, the extent of tissue damage may be slightly less severe, potentially leading to a slower incapacitation.

2. Wound Pathology and Tissue Damage:

Airgun (Bintac M50):

• The entry wound would be relatively small (due to the size of the 30-caliber bullet) with a cleaner hole compared to expanding projectiles.
• However, the projectile’s path through soft tissue (muscles, veins, arteries) and bone would likely lead to severe hemorrhage if it severs major blood vessels.
• The saboted projectile might not expand inside the body as much as a firearm bullet would, meaning the wound channel could be more consistent and narrow, but still deadly if it strikes vital areas.
• The jugular vein or carotid artery being severed would result in rapid blood loss, likely leading to death within minutes (depending on how quickly blood pressure drops). Involuntary gasping and loss of consciousness would follow shortly after the injury.
• The exit wound on the left side of the throat would likely be similarly small , but larger, and oval than the entrance, assuming tumbling behavior, but could cause rapid bleeding as the airgun projectile exits the body.

3. Vital Organ Damage:

Airgun (Bintac M50):

• The 30-caliber projectile from the airgun would likely damage or sever major blood vessels in the neck, leading to death by exsanguination (blood loss). If the bullet hits T1, it could damage the spinal cord, potentially causing paralysis and loss of motor function prior to death.

Scenario Overview: Seated Subject is on a bar stool type chair, with legs on rung, and the body in a relaxed seated position, hands are clasp in front holding an object. The observed subject is shot from behind by a static platform delivering a saboted 30 caliber projectile at a downward angle. The round enters the back at the collar-line, T1, left, traverses the neck, and exits the front left of the subjects throat. Provide extensive evaluation given the provided model in a simulation and evaluate the forensic conclusions on what outcomes would be expected given that ballistic path.

Weapon: Bintac M50 airgun with saboted 30-caliber round.
Distance: Approximately 6 feet.
Projectile Characteristics: 30-caliber bullet, saboted in a larger casing, traveling at an estimated velocity of 900-1100 fps (due to the lighter weight and high velocity of the airgun round).
Shot Placement: The projectile strikes the left side of the neck, aiming to hit T1 (first thoracic vertebra), likely severing key arteries (such as the jugular vein and carotid artery), and exiting through the left side of the throat.

Evaluated Forensic Digital Autopsy: Simulated Use of Bintac M50

1. Wound Ballistics and Initial Trauma:
Projectile Velocity & Energy Transfer:
Bintac M50 Airgun: The 30-caliber saboted round travels at an estimated velocity of 900-1100 fps, delivering a relatively high velocity but still lower energy compared to traditional firearms.
Energy Output: Assuming a mass of 200-230 grains (13-15 grams) for the saboted round, the energy (in joules) would be comparable to high-velocity rounds from rifles or handguns.

Wound Characteristics:
Bintac M50: Upon impact, the 30-caliber saboted round would separate from the sabot if it had not already done so, and enter the neckline likely cause, puncture wounds to the skin, muscle, and possibly bone due to the velocity and penetrating nature of the projectile.
If the round hits T1, it would sever the jugular vein, carotid artery, and potentially the spinal cord, leading to rapid hemorrhage.

2. Wound Pathology and Tissue Damage:
Airgun (Bintac M50):
The entry wound would be relatively small (due to the size of the 30-caliber bullet) with a cleaner hole compared to a firearm’s expanding projectiles. It would not be noticeable to the naked eye at the time of the shot.
However, the projectile’s path through soft tissue (muscles, veins, arteries) and bone would likely lead to severe hemorrhage if it severs major blood vessels.
The saboted projectile might not expand inside the body as much as a firearm bullet would, meaning the wound channel could be more consistent and narrow, but still deadly if it strikes vital areas.

The jugular vein or carotid artery being severed would result in rapid blood loss, likely leading to death within minutes (depending on how quickly blood pressure drops). Involuntary gasping and loss of consciousness would follow shortly after the injury.
The exit wound on the left side of the throat would likely be similarly small, as noted before, depending on bullet traversal, if the projectile is tumbling, but could cause further bleeding as the projectile exits the body at a much lower velocity than at entry.

3. Vital Organ Damage:
Airgun (Bintac M50):
The 30-caliber projectile from the airgun would likely damage or sever major blood vessels in the neck, leading to death by exsanguination (blood loss). If the bullet hits T1, it could damage the spinal cord, potentially causing paralysis and loss of motor function prior to death.

4. Timing of Death and Lethality:
Airgun (Bintac M50): While death by hemorrhage would likely occur, it could take longer for the airgun round to incapacitate the subject due to its subsonic velocity and energy. The projectile would need to create a path of destruction capable of severing critical arteries, but initial lack of cavitation and shock trauma means the projectile might not instantly stop cardiac or respiratory function.

5. Neurological Movements:

Based on the physical and neurological responses to a fatal gunshot wound, it’s very likely that the arms and hands would move upward at the time of impact, and the person would fall to their left.

Let’s break this down step by step:

• 1. Neurological and Reflexive Response to the Shot
  
• When a person is shot, especially in a vital area like the neck, the neurological reflexes often cause immediate and involuntary reactions. The intensity of these reflexes can vary based on where the wound occurs, the severity of the damage, and the nervous system response. Here’s why we’d expect these reactions:
  
• Immediate Pain Response: Even though the person might be unconscious almost immediately due to blood loss or shock, the body’s reflexive responses to pain are automatic. A shot to the neck, particularly one that severs major arteries (like the carotid artery or jugular vein) or damages the spinal cord, would trigger immediate pain reflexes.
  
  • Arms and Hands Raising: The motor nerves in the arms, especially the brachial plexus (which controls the arms), would react to the pain stimulus or to the trauma from spinal damage. Even if the shot causes near-instant loss of motor control due to spinal cord damage, reflexive movements could still occur in the arms and hands, particularly the muscle contractions in response to the pain or the sudden shock of the injury. These involuntary movements may cause the hands and arms to raise momentarily, especially if the injury affects the nervous system higher up in the spinal column, such as the cervical spine or upper spinal cord.
    
• Spinal Cord and Posture: If the projectile damages the spinal cord at T1 or higher, it could interfere with the brain’s ability to send signals to the body. However, spinal reflexes could still cause the hands and arms to react, even before complete paralysis sets in. This might result in arms twitching or rising, though the exact nature of this response depends on the severity and location of spinal damage.
  
• 2. Falling Direction and Positioning
  
• Sitting Position: The position described is one seated on a bar stool with feet elevated and hands clasped in lap, which means they are relatively stable but also vulnerable to a sudden loss of motor control or balance when injured.
  
• Impact on the Left Side of the Neck: Given that the shot is directed at the left side of the neck, and the shot passes downward (at an elevated angle), it’s likely that the left side of the body would absorb more of the initial trauma. The upper body (head, neck, shoulders) would likely move in response to the force of the impact, and this could cause the subject to fall to their left side, where the injury is located.
  • The muscles on the left side of the neck would be directly affected by the gunshot, and the loss of blood or the damage to the spinal cord could cause the body to collapse in that direction. The reflexes and loss of control would likely lead to the arms and upper body jerking or tipping to the left, causing the individual to fall in that direction.
    
• Falling to the Left: Since the hands are clasped in the lap and there’s no outward brace or positioning to prevent a fall, the weight of the torso would naturally cause the subject to fall to their left. The elevated position of the feet on the stool could also contribute to an unbalanced fall, making it more difficult for the subject to regain any control or react to stabilize themselves.
  
  • Motor Control Loss: With severe blood loss and possible spinal cord injury, the reflexive fall to the left would likely be uncontrollable, and the body would collapse with the arms possibly raised briefly as a reflex but then dropping as the victim becomes unconscious due to shock.
    
• Summary: What Would Happen After the Shot?
  
• Immediate Reflex: At the moment of impact, the arms and hands would likely raise momentarily or exhibit a startle reflex due to the pain or neurological response.
  
• Fall to the Left: Due to the shot’s impact on the left side of the neck, combined with the body’s neurological and reflexive responses, the subject would likely fall to their left side as the left side of the body absorbs the trauma.
  
• Uncontrollable Collapse: Once the spinal cord or vital arteries are severed, the subject would likely lose consciousness very quickly, leading to a slumped fall in the direction of the shot. The leftward fall would be influenced by the body’s loss of balance, and the reflex movements would be short-lived as paralysis or shock sets in.
  
• In conclusion, the subjects body would likely react with involuntary arm movements (arms rising or twitching), and the fall would happen to their left due to the impact of the shot, the loss of motor control, and the directional force of the injury. The arms might rise due to reflexive motor responses, but the subject would quickly lose control and collapse to their left side due to the rapid onset of unconsciousness from hemorrhage and spinal cord damage.
  

Key Comparison Points for Identical Projectile Mass For Frontal 30-06 or Rear Sabot 30 Caliber (150-180 Grains):

Parameter	Bintac M50 Airgun (Back Shot)	.30-06 Rifle (Front Shot)
Projectile Type	Saboted 30-caliber round	Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) or Soft/ Hollow-point .30-06
Projectile Weight	150-180 grains (~9.7-11.7 grams)	150-180 grains (~9.7-11.7 grams)
Muzzle Velocity	~900-1100 fps (Subsonic)	~2500-2800 fps (Supersonic)
Kinetic Energy	~400 ft-lbs	~2800-3000 ft-lbs
Entry Wound Size	5-7 mm (clean, round)	8-10 mm or larger (irregular, jagged)
Wound Shape	Clean, minimal tearing	Jagged, with significant tissue displacement
Cavitation	Minimal (due to low energy)	Extensive (shockwave + high energy)
Tissue Damage	Confining to arteries, veins, muscles	Extensive, with damage to arteries, veins, nerves, bone
Bone Impact (Vertebrae)	Potential fracture of T1	Likely fractures vertebrae (T1) or splinters vertebrae
Spinal Cord Injury	Possible, localized damage	Immediate severance or severe damage
Blood Loss	Severe hemorrhage from carotid/jugular	Massive hemorrhage from carotid/jugular, + additional tissue destruction
Entry Channel (through neck)	Relatively narrow (soft tissues)	Widened by high velocity, explosive tissue trauma
Exit Wound Size	7-10 mm, clean	10-15 mm, irregular, with possible fragmentation
Path of Bullet	Straight line (minimal deviation)	Deviation due to bone fragmentation or soft tissue expansion
Energy Transfer to Tissues	Low compared to high-velocity bullets	High, with explosive tissue displacement
Effects on Vital Organs	Immediate loss of consciousness from vascular damage	Immediate loss of consciousness from vascular and/or spinal cord damage
Effect on Spinal Cord	Possible damage to spinal cord at T1	Likely damage or severing of spinal cord at T1, instantaneous paralysis
Consciousness Loss	Within 30 seconds to 2 minutes due to blood loss	Instantaneous or within seconds due to shock, blood loss, and spinal cord injury
Body Movement Response	Arm twitching or slight rise, leftward fall	Violent arm flailing or rise, backward fall due to shock wave and energy transfer
Physical Collapse	Slumped to the left due to injury location	Violent backward fall, body jerked due to high-velocity trauma
Exit Wound Characteristics	Clean exit, with limited tissue destruction	Irregular exit with potential for secondary fragmentation
Fatality Timeline	3-5 minutes (blood loss and shock)	Immediate to 1-2 minutes (massive hemorrhage, shock, or spinal injury)
Tissue Elasticity / Expansion	Minimal due to low velocity (no shockwave)	High due to shockwave and cavitation
Rate of Blood Loss	Slow, but steady hemorrhage due to severed carotid/jugular	Rapid and catastrophic blood loss due to high-velocity bullet rupture and arterial damage
Physical Reflexes	Limited reflexes, arms may briefly twitch or rise, collapse to the left	Violent reflexive rise of arms, body pushed backward, collapse
Impact on Breathing	Damage to trachea, but airways are less affected	Potential damage to trachea, larynx, causing asphyxiation if not immediately fatal
Post-Injury Spinal Reflex	Limited (possible tingling or minor paralysis if spinal cord affected)	Immediate paralysis below the injury site
Exit Wound in Soft Tissue	Clean with some bruising, minimal tearing	Irregular, with large bruising and tissue shearing

---

Key Observations Based on Identical Projectile Weight:

1. Projectile Mass & Size:
   • Both the Bintac M50 airgun and the .30-06 rifle fire a similar mass projectile (150-180 grains), which suggests that the initial impact on tissue will be similar in terms of penetration potential.
   • The .30-06 rifle, however, still has far greater velocity and kinetic energy, which means its impact energy is vastly superior to the airguns subsonic cartridge. The airgun delivers much less energy due to its lower velocity (~900-1100 fps vs. ~2500-2800 fps for the rifle), which directly influences wound dynamics.
     
2. Velocity and Energy:
   • Bintac M50 Airgun: The lower velocity (~900-1100 fps) results in a lower kinetic energy, similar to 300 blackout (~400 ft-lbs), meaning the wound channel is narrower and the shock effects are much less pronounced than for supersonic 30 caliber rounds. The energy transfer to tissues is less forceful, and there’s less shockwave or cavitation, leading to more localized damage.
   • .30-06 Rifle: The high velocity (~2500-2800 fps) of the .30-06 results in high kinetic energy (~2800-3000 ft-lbs), which creates a massive shockwave and cavitation in the tissues. This leads to widespread tissue destruction, including bone fragmentation, significant energy transfer, and explosive tissue displacement.
     
3. Entry and Exit Wounds:
   • Both projectiles will create similar-sized entry wounds based on their mass. However, the exit wound from the .30-06 rifle would be larger and more irregular due to the shock effects of the high velocity. The airgun would leave a more clean exit with minimal expansion.
     
4. Spinal Cord and Bone Damage:
   • The airgun might cause spinal cord damage at T1, but it would likely be less severe compared to a .30-06 shot. A .30-06 rifle would shatter the vertebrae from the front, leading to instantaneous paralysis and likely spinal cord severance, making the rifle shot far more catastrophic in terms of immediate incapacitation.
     
5. Fatality Timeline:
   • The Bintac M50 airgun shot, while fatal, would likely lead to death within 3-5 minutes due to hemorrhaging and shock, depending on the location of the wound. The .30-06 rifle, however, would result in immediate or near-instant incapacitation and potentially death within seconds to 1-2 minutes due to the massive shock and blood loss.

---

Forensic Conclusion:

The main difference between these two scenarios, despite the identical projectile weight, lies in the velocity and kinetic energy of the projectiles.

• Bintac M50 Airgun (Back Shot): The injury would cause localized tissue damage, minimal shock, and slower fatality due to lower velocity and energy. The body’s reaction would be less violent, leading to a more gradual collapse to the side of the injury. The described scenario fits this profile.
  
• .30-06 Rifle (Front Shot): The high velocity of the .30-06 results in immediate catastrophic injury, including explosive tissue destruction, shock trauma, and rapid incapacitation. The body’s reflexes would be more violent, and the fall would likely be backward due to the shock of the injury.

This reassessment accounts for the identical mass of the projectiles but emphasizes how velocity and kinetic energy still drastically affect the injury outcome in terms of shock, damage, and body responses.

Given this research and subsequent combined information, the finding of this review is that Charlie Kirk was likely shot from behind via a disguised weapon, a weapon which was removed immediately from the crime scene, with Tyler Robinson and the grandfathers 30 caliber rifle being framed as the source.

Truth Lives.